Post by speedmerchant on Dec 15, 2006 10:09:36 GMT -6
Hello everyone! I am new to the forum and really appreciate all of the great insight the forum has to offer.
My son and I are coming up on our 2nd PWD in late January. Last year he won his Pack race and went on to the districts where he finished 5th. We spent a lot of time together learning about the physics involved in making a PWD car as fast as possible (on an elementary level, of course). We did a ton of research and were meticulous in assembling the car. He won his Pack by a wide margin. There wasn’t a car within 2 car lengths all day. ;D
However, at the District race we couldn’t manage better than a 4th place finish. We lost to cars that “appeared” to have very little science involved. In fact, the winning car was a rather large, blocky design with the weight screwed onto the top and well forward of the rear axles. After the race, we checked the alignment and found all to be excellent. The COM on our car was at 1 inch in front of the rear axles.
The only difference between the Pack track and the District track was length and material. The Pack track was standard 32 foot wooden (great shape) but the District track was 46 foot aluminum. My question – were we too aggressive in our COM location for a long track? The car seemed to slow quicker than all the others. The dilemma – how to weight a car that needs to win on a standard track AND a long track since we can’t change it after the car is built? I have come up empty in my research in trying to find answers to this. I do not have a track to test theories on either, so I'm hoping the Pro's can help!
Thanks for any insight!
Mike
My son and I are coming up on our 2nd PWD in late January. Last year he won his Pack race and went on to the districts where he finished 5th. We spent a lot of time together learning about the physics involved in making a PWD car as fast as possible (on an elementary level, of course). We did a ton of research and were meticulous in assembling the car. He won his Pack by a wide margin. There wasn’t a car within 2 car lengths all day. ;D
However, at the District race we couldn’t manage better than a 4th place finish. We lost to cars that “appeared” to have very little science involved. In fact, the winning car was a rather large, blocky design with the weight screwed onto the top and well forward of the rear axles. After the race, we checked the alignment and found all to be excellent. The COM on our car was at 1 inch in front of the rear axles.
The only difference between the Pack track and the District track was length and material. The Pack track was standard 32 foot wooden (great shape) but the District track was 46 foot aluminum. My question – were we too aggressive in our COM location for a long track? The car seemed to slow quicker than all the others. The dilemma – how to weight a car that needs to win on a standard track AND a long track since we can’t change it after the car is built? I have come up empty in my research in trying to find answers to this. I do not have a track to test theories on either, so I'm hoping the Pro's can help!
Thanks for any insight!
Mike